Adobe heading for the Big League

The news that Adobe are buying the analytics company Omniture for $1.8 billionĀ  http://www.omniture.com/press/777 suggests that Adobe are looking to move firmly into the markets that are controlled by Google and Microsoft. This seems to be a continuation of the direction they embarked on with the aquisition of Macromedia. At that time some commentators assumed it would be merely a fit with their web design and graphics software, but this new move suggests that it was really the Flash format they wanted to control and that they’re moving much more towards tracking and interaction analysis for online marketing.

I have to say I’ve never been a big fan of Adobe – back in the 1990s I developed a dislike of their interfaces in Pagemaker and Photoshop and I’d much rather they’d left Dreamweaver and Fireworks alone. As an SEO I naturally have a jaundiced eye for Flash and as a user who values my privacy I really dislike Flash cookies which seem to be everywhere – since I installed a Firefox plug-in to delete them I’m finding them all over the place. I can’t really blame Adobe for those though – they just aquired something that was already there. However the combination of them and the sort of tracking capability in Omniture (I haven’t used it myself but I’m told by a friend who has that it’s way more detailed than Google Analytics) promises to give Adobe a lot of clout in the targeted adverts and marketing profile business if I’m reading the situation correctly.

Greatest wastes of time in SEO – #1 Submission

It never ceases to amaze me how many old discredited techniques and actions are still being recommended by people who purport to be experts. So this is the first in an occasional series of pointless things that are not worth the time it takes to think about them let alone to do them. This one was inspired by a thread on a well known business networking site.

Submitting to search engines – don’t do it!!

I can barely remember when it was last even a vaguely good idea to do this. You see there are these things called spiders that go out and find sites every minute of every day – yeah radical stuff eh – and all you need to do is give them one link to a new site or page and they’ll be on it like a rash the next time they crawl the page with the link on it. You’ll be doing this anyway if you have the slightest intention of anyone ever seeing the page so it’s automatic. Hell, Google will sometimes go looking for a site that’s not linked to yet (it may still be in development) because it knows about the domain registration. It’s hard to stop them at times. If you can’t get a new page into the index you’ve got a lot more to worry about than submissions.

I haven’t submitted a site to Google this decade, or Yahoo, and only ever one to MSN when for some reason it was having trouble finding it. And most of my new sites get found within a couple of days at the very most. One was indexed in half an hour because I linked to it from a blog.

And the danger if you don’t stamp out the practice by firmly saying it’s unnecessary is that your clients may themselves submit multiple times and be seen as submission spamming.

So the next time some idiot tries to sell you submission services tell him you’d rather speak to an SEO!

Localised fallout from bank search

I often see ads and articles for local SEO that concentrate on getting into the Google Local results that appear for geographically-related searches – usually after the third organic result. While it’s a useful area to cover I do tend to take it with a little pinch of salt because I’ve seen some odd results from it and there’s no clear relationship between the strength of a site and whether you can get one of the coveted 10 places. But I always thought there was at least some degree of checking of who registers a business at an address – clunky though the send-a-postcard system is. But what are we to make of the result below for the search term “bank of scotland”? Note item H.

A curious Google local result

A curious Google local result

Whatever you think of the banks and the current financial crisis it seems a bit strange that a site that appears to be about exposing banking fraud should appear as a local business, and when you follow the “more” link, with the address of the Bank of Scotland in St Andrew Square. You’d think there’d be enough screening to avoid such entries.

The SEO implications of Binghoo

So it’s finally happened, though not quite in the way some were predicting, the new collaboration of Microsoft and Yahoo could change the face of search and online advertising; or it could be a damp squib which will have no effect on Google’s dominance at all.

What might well happen though is that it may change the way some SEOs approach their craft. The reason for this is that with Bing providing the search results, albeit packaged in whatever way Yahoo decides, we may no longer have access to the Yahoo backlink data. Bing, like its Live Search predecessor, doesn’t have a link command that works, while not only has Google’s link command been useless for years but the recent changes to Webmaster Tools have resulted in far fewer link results there too.

The vast majority of link analysis tools also make use of the Yahoo data, and without that data most of the SEOs that base their strategies predominently on links will have very little to go on. So they’ll either have to fly blind or change their strategies to a more rounded approach. Their only alternative would be to subscribe to the SEOMoz Linkscape data.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens, particularly in the US where my impression is that they tend to concentrate more on the link-building approach than we do in the UK. Of course it may make Rand Fishkin a very rich man! But it might also produce a change in what I personally regard as an overly link-biased way of approaching search engine optimisation. And that might mean that there’s less of a battle between SEOs and Google, who are constantly trying to discount the latest tricks for getting more links.

A plethora of changes in the search landscape

The other day I was at an internet marketing meetup talk given by a fellow SEO and had time to reflect on the many changes that have occurred in the whole field of search and internet communications and marketing in the last 8 months since I was regularly blogging. The perspective of looking back over that period was both shocking and enlightening.

So where to start on a summary of changes. Even a brief consideration will give us the following:

  • Recent Google layout changes and development
  1. Further inclusion of video, images, news and local results
  2. The Wonder Wheel
  3. More description text
  4. Rich snippets
  • The rise of Twitter
  • Increasing personalisation and localisation of Google search results
  • Mobile search developments
  • Google Chrome browser
  • The canonical tag
  • Wolfram Alpha search engine

Now of course in the last couple of days since I first started writing this post and got interrupted there have been two potentially game-changing events:

  • Google are now able to follow some JavaScript links
  • The way that no-followed links work with regard to PageRank flow has changed

One thing about SEO – it’s never dull or lacking a challenge! And to think some clients still read five year-old advice and then ask why you aren’t doing it.

I’ll be looking at each of these changes in the next few posts – assuming that nothing else even more important crops up in the meantime ;-)

Measuring SEO success 2 – What really matters

An earlier post looked at why search position reports still have a place; although it should be said that this is changing rapidly as the search landscape changes. This one goes beyond that and looks at why rankings are only the first step; what you should be aiming for with your website and what you should be measuring to assess it. This post and others to come are aimed more at site owners rather than SEOs, who really should already know this stuff if they are looking beyond a very narrow definition of what SEO is. However it’s so easy to get bogged down in technicalities that it never does any harm to refresh your mind on why you’re busy working on projects whether it’s recoding sites or chasing links.

Profit – ultimately the only real measure that counts

At the end of the day any commercial company needs to make money and its website has to contribute to that. There are different ways, some direct and some indirect, in which it can do that. All of these ways depend on traffic.

The basic value of traffic

To some extent traffic alone can give you some revenue via advertising impressions. It can also contribute to your company’s PR and branding presence. How much value you place on that depends on you and your particular market and whether the site is purely standalone or part of a wider operation. (As an aside it always surprises me to hear businesses that spend thousands on Yellow Pages and other conventional print advertising, considering it well spent despite little direct evidence of return, who will dismiss the advertising value of their website and insist that they only count direct sales against it.)

Conversions

However the real value only starts to kick in when you have some sort of conversion. That could be a small contribution if it’s that the user clicked on a paid advert or affiliate link and left the site. Or it could be a subscription or a sale for a large value item. But it can take many other forms. It could be that it generates a lead that produces a profitable business to business collaboration – do you have measures to assign such a lead against your site?

It’s also perfectly possible for the money for a direct sale to be taken at another stage – your “conversion” may be that the user orders a catalogue or requests a callback which allows your sales team to interact with them as a likely prospect – so you have to define your conversions carefully and assign your successes accordingly or you’ll have no clear idea of what’s working for you and what isn’t.

Sources of Traffic

Assuming you’re running a commercial website (and few non-commercial sites would be spending money on detailed analysis unless perhaps they were a charitable organisation which had to justify it’s web spend) then your traffic will come from one of the following sources:

  • Organic search results
  • Paid search results
  • referrals from others sites either by links and recommendations or through paid advertising
  • direct visits from people who know your site from previous visits
  • direct visits from people who’ve discovered your address via other channels such as TV or printed media.

Measuring Traffic

To get an idea of what is working on your site and to try to improve matters you need to measure your traffic and understand how it behaves in the site. There are many ways of measuring traffic, but unfortunately very few of them are accurate. This is an area I’ve studied extensively and specialised in for a while so I speak from direct experience.

Hit Counters

Back in the “old” days you’d see garishly styled hit-counters on many sites. These were generally based on a very simple bit of JavaScript and were hilariously inaccurate and easily fooled.

Online Stats Packages

Many web hosting packages come with free online traffic recording statistics which attempt to analyse the log files which should be recorded on your server – they’re usually worth exactly what you paid for them because most of them can’t differentiate between search engine spiders, site scrapers, and real human traffic. Even the better ones such as AWStats which give well-formatted multi-page reports are really only guessing at what’s happening. They can give some useful information in some areas but should be approached with caution and used more as an indication to further detailed study.

Logfile Analysis Programs

Then there are a range of reporting tools which run on your local PC to analyse those same server log files once you’ve downloaded them – programs such as Webtrends and SurfStats. Such programs can be much more detailed as there is no problem of load on the web server and they can be configured to some extent and updated when changes occur. However the nature of the logs means that in order to derive meaningful figures the designers need to make certain assumptions about what constitutes a page view or an unique visit, and there are complications due to such things as the caches used by the major ISPs. The result is that the major programs in this field seldom agree with each other and you can only compare reports derived from the same program.

Analytics Programs

These programs are the usual choice for the most detailed information – they all utilise some form of tracking system for each page of your site. This can be an embedded link to a small graphics file or a JavaScript program such as is used by Google Analytics. Commercial examples will usually have a little more detail in their reports but obviously have a direct cost. Free programs such as the one from Google are viewed on-line and thus of course dependent on their servers being available. You also have to consider that while the commercial ones will usually regard your data as confidential, using the free ones means you are sharing your data with the supplier in a much more open-ended manner.

Whichever of these analytics programs you choose there is much more data available than with the other systems and on the whole that data is more reliable, though it should be said that no analytics system is ever completely accurate.

You’ll be able to see the number of visits, unique visits, length of time on site and on individual pages. You’ll be able to see which keywords were used to arrive via organic search or pay per click. what the bounce rate was and you can usually set up “goals”, which can record activities such as making a purchase or requesting a callback or a brochure.

It’s these measures that are far more important than simple search rankings in determining how successfully your website is performing as well as giving clues to how to improve it.

Once you can read and interpret this type of data you’ll be in a much better position to understand how users react to your site and to draw conclusions about how you can improve it. For instance there may be a keyword phrase that you have a very high ranking for in Google. However the traffic that arrives from that source may be spending very little time on the target page and a large percentage may be bouncing off without looking at other pages. Close investigation of the analytics data may allow you to understand why and to take action to improve the page that the users are landing on.

A good SEO company should be able to not only achieve rankings but also improve your overall traffic, your understanding of how your site works, your conversion rate, and ultimately your bottom line.