<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Musings &#187; site command</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/tag/site-command/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>common sense from a Scottish SEO consultant in Edinburgh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 15:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Google site command oddities &#8211; and Bing too</title>
		<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/google/more-google-site-command-oddities-and-bing-too.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/google/more-google-site-command-oddities-and-bing-too.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site command]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I mentioned I was seeing more and more erratic behaviour in the once-reliable Google site command. Today I noticed more strangeness on this very site. In March I had 163 pages indexed, at the beginning of April I had dropped to 138. Now I&#8217;ve dropped again to 113. But the really [...]<p><a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/google/more-google-site-command-oddities-and-bing-too.php">More Google site command oddities &#8211; and Bing too</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog">Search Engine Musings</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/google/more-google-site-command-oddities-and-bing-too.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google site command oddities</title>
		<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/google-site-command-oddities.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/google-site-command-oddities.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site command]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time I&#8217;ve been noticing irregularities in the results of the information that Google provides through the various commands and through the Webmaster Tools facility. Of course we all know the link command has been hopelessly broken for many years and frankly I don&#8217;t know why it&#8217;s still there, but the site command was [...]<p><a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/google-site-command-oddities.php">Google site command oddities</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog">Search Engine Musings</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/google-site-command-oddities.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
