<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Musings &#187; supplemental index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/tag/supplemental-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>common sense from a Scottish SEO consultant in Edinburgh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 15:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How mature is Bing and is it worth optimising for it?</title>
		<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/msn/how-mature-is-bing-and-is-it-worth-optimising-for-it.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/msn/how-mature-is-bing-and-is-it-worth-optimising-for-it.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing / MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental index]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While in the US they seem to be raving about the rise in search market share that Bing has achieved, even before the extent of the Yahoo results takeover becomes clear, here in Europe its making little impact on Google&#8217;s dominance. In fact the figures I see in the major market share analyst sites doesn&#8217;t [...]<p><a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/msn/how-mature-is-bing-and-is-it-worth-optimising-for-it.php">How mature is Bing and is it worth optimising for it?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog">Search Engine Musings</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/msn/how-mature-is-bing-and-is-it-worth-optimising-for-it.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checking Supplemental pages</title>
		<link>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/checking-supplemental-pages.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/checking-supplemental-pages.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental index]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/checking-supplemental-pages.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an earlier post I spoke about Google&#8217;s planned removal of the supplementals tag from their results. They went ahead with it and it caused quite a stir amongst webmasters and SEOs. Various people have looked for alternative ways to discover which of their pages are still in the supplemental index. US SEO firm Bruce [...]<p><a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/checking-supplemental-pages.php">Checking Supplemental pages</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog">Search Engine Musings</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/checking-supplemental-pages.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
