RIP AlltheWeb

I was sad to see that Yahoo have announced that AlltheWeb will cease to exist from April 4th and queries will be redirected to Yahoo.

Of course it was inevitable given the fact that Yahoo itself is now powered by Bing (not quite yet in the UK but it’s not far away), and hardly anyone used AlltheWeb any more, but for those of us who’ve been around long enough to remember the old days it was a very nice search engine which I often found to produce better results than Google, Yahoo and MSN, and was very quick, had a simple interface and was generally a very pleasant system to use.

Personally I had hoped that Yahoo would adopt it completely and replace their own system but it seems the purchase was more about getting rid of a competitor and stopping the technology from being bought by anyone else. At a time when Google has a near monopoly and lots of people are hoping the Blekko provides some sort of challenge it’s tempting to recall days when there was more diversity and some real competition. If we had three or four genuinely popular search engines now who all used different algorithms then we’ve have a lot less link manipulation and the sort of dreadful content farms that Google is having to try to combat now.

 

Back in the saddle

Hell, it’s been a  long time since I’ve done any blogging. Major life events – bereavements in family and friends, divorce, house purchase, and a load of other stuff – have rather got in the way and my clients’ sites have had priority.

Now safely settled in a new house and office and with Spring finally showing its face it’s time get this site back on the rails and start commenting again on our ever-changing industry. Anyone still out there?

The Problems of Privacy on Social Networking

As those who know me will testify I am no longer young, and while I think as “young” as I can, inevitably my attitudes reflect those of my generation to some extent. One aspect of the younger generations that I struggle with is their blasé attitude to privacy. We who were brought up on stories of the horrors of state surveillance in the Soviet block value our privacy, but the interconnected internet world has produced a generation  who think nothing of sharing their most intimate secrets online, often to “friends”. Even the occasional stories of people being fired for making comments about their work doesn’t seem to deter them.

Now being an SEO means I have to advise clients about their online exposure and inevitably the global success of Facebook means that they come up in such conversations. However I myself have been extremely wary of Facebook due to the various cavalier changes they’ve made to their user’s privacy settings and I am deeply suspicious of any system that can be used to join up databases of people’s activities and opinions and expose them to other agencies – whether those agencies are governmental or advertising,  insurance companies or marketing.

I do use Twitter but I’m careful how I use it. I don’t have a personal Facebook account and although I did once toy with a company account I never completed it as it required a personal one to go with it and I can’t even access it now to delete it.

Today I noticed two posts:

Facebook Removes User Profile Rights and Choices by Kim Krause Berg

and

F*ck Facebook and the Facebook Personalization program by Alan Bleiweiss (reader of a delicate disposition be warned)

which details two new sets of changes to how Facebook operate. I’ll leave you to draw your own conclusions but for me it confirms all my worst fears, and confirms that I will never have a Facebook account.

More Google site command oddities – and Bing too

A few weeks ago I mentioned I was seeing more and more erratic behaviour in the once-reliable Google site command. Today I noticed more strangeness on this very site. In March I had 163 pages indexed, at the beginning of April I had dropped to 138. Now I’ve dropped again to 113. But the really weird thing is that it’s not any of the blog pages that have vanished, which might be at least understandable; it’s some of the main site static pages which are missing.

Checking the internal links in Webmaster Tools shows they’re still recorded – although as has been the case for some time the number of internal links being shown is wildly wrong.

I’d be inclined normally to discount this as unimportant but I’m also seeing odd yoyoing effects in my rankings which are attributable to them occasionally “losing” the natural page for a particular query and using another page which doesn’t deserve to rank as much. Previously I’d have put this down to a page dropping into the supplemental index temporarily – now I’m wondering if they’re losing it altogether.

And Bing Too

Bing’s site command has been very strange almost since they took over from MSN. All of a sudden on this site they’re showing 102 indexed pages in the World results and when you switch to UK-only results they only show 36 !!

And people wonder why SEO’s are paranoid ;-)

Personalised and real-time search – let me turn them off!

Call me an old Luddite if you will, but to me – as a user rather than just as an SEO – personalised search is a faulty concept. The whole point of “search” is that I’m looking for something I usually don’t know much about – so why would I want sites that I already know about appearing in search results? If they had what I wanted I wouldn’t need to do a search! Personalisation only really makes sense if you use search engines merely as a navigation tool rather than a search tool. Ok we know some people do that but are we really restricting  the capability and functionality of something as important as search on the habits of people who can’t be bothered to learn to use bookmarks?

As regards real-time search I only see the point in it for news-based queries – otherwise being new doesn’t make something any more relevant or carry any quality signal, so why focus on it? And it seems I’m not the only one to think so according to a new study summarised here.

The appearance of Twitter or Facebook entries in search results is completely irrelevant for the sort of searches I make, and most of the time so is video. I’d like to be able to turn them off and only include them on the rare occasions when I think they are relevant. I already use a Firefox add-on that kills Adwords for my personal searches since I *never* use PPC ads and they’ve become progressively more annoying. Sadly Google seem determined to show me what they think I should see and not what I want to see, and they resist all suggestions to allow us flexibility. They insist on devoting all their visible efforts to these increasingly complex layouts and features that push real organic results further down the page, yet the quality of the organic results is probably worse now than it was 5 years ago and they seem to be unable to filter out obvious spam of a type that they claim to hate and we ethical SEO’s have been railing against for years.

The end result is a low quality experience for many users. I would say to them to concentrate on quality and simplicity – which was what made them popular in the first place – and give us a choice of what we want to see in the results rather than foist unwanted “features” on us. Because if they don’t then they really are risking losing users to someone else that will give us what we want. The online world is littered with once-popular sites and companies that have died the death, and no-one, not even Google, is immune from changing public preferences.

Ethical internet marketing in an unethical world

I’ve never been a great fan of television but this last week or so I’ve been down with flu and often unable to sleep for coughing, but when I wasn’t in bed I had very little concentration to do any work that I felt I could rely on, so had to resort to the dreaded tube to while away the hours while my body fights off the virus. So I’ve been seeing rather more adverts than I’d like.

Now being an SEO means I’m involved in marketing, and that’s something that didn’t come easily to me. In fact I once, many years ago, defined marketing as persuading people to buy things they don’t need by lying to them. That was back in my book trade days with James Thin when one of my colleagues was doing a marketing course. One of the reasons I enjoyed working in the book trade was that we basically took an ethical approach to selling books. We kept as wide a range of quality books as we were able to sell profitably, and we mainly sold to people who loved books and wanted the knowledge and literature they contained. (Maybe that’s why the old book trade has largely been wiped out by more business-savy competitors who were prepared to play dirty!)

Gradually I wised up and came to realise that marketing is at least a necessary evil if you’re going to stay in business, but in my subsequent move into website design, search engine optimisation and ecommerce I’ve always tried to stick to honest businesses and quality approaches to advertising, in the same way as I try to write quality content rather than regurgitated rubbish. But the problem is the world doesn’t always work the same way.

Those TV adverts I mentioned I’ve been seeing; I’m fine with the ones trying to get you to come to their store by highlighting cheap prices, even if they aren’t always typical. I’m ok with the ones selling dreams – “your life will be far better if you only had a …..”, even if they don’t always seem very realistic, caveat emptor and all that. I start to have problems with banks who advertise great interest rates which turn out to be fleeting or misleading, especially when we just bailed them out with money the government will claw back from us. But the one’s I really dislike are at another level entirely. What are those? Well for example there’s all those companies trying to part people from their gold jewellery at knock-down prices, who thankfully are reportedly being investigated (though it doesn’t seem to be discouraging the ads). Now there seems to be a spate of “need money quickly” ads with staggeringly high interest rates – 2356% APR on one I saw. (Isn’t that kinda like the rates that illegal moneylenders charge?)

TV ads like those make me ashamed to be human let alone be in a marketing-related business. The people who fall for them may be guillible but they might also be desperate, and I see no justification in taking advantage of them. We’re supposed to be a bit more evolved than that.

I sometimes wonder if the internet is evolving in the wrong direction. It started very ethical with lots of optimistic, almost utopian visions, but it’s become progressively more commercialised and with that has come the seedier side of human nature. I seem to remember a promising internet company that had a motto. What was it again? Oh yeah – “Don’t be Evil”. For some time everyone wondered how they would make money – all they seemed to want to do was provide good quality search results. Then they invented Adwords and money started pouring in. Unfortunately they also went and invented Adsense, and that generated loads of spammy low-value sites built purely for rankings by Black-hat SEOs to generate money-making clicks. And to combat those leech-like sites more people started more trickery and more low-value, often autogenerated or scraped content sites.

I could build loads of sites like that and make money, but that’s not my way. I want the internet to be better than that and I care more about being able to look at myself in the mirror than being rich.

Flu-fuelled thoughts aren’t always the clearest and I when I came back to it I realised that this post was meandering a bit. While I was working out how to finish it off I saw a new post from Aaron Wall – Slow & Steady vs Hype, Crash & Burn – which deals with the sort of get-rich-quick scammy marketing that I dislike so much. This is the sort of thing that gets internet marketing a bad name. Yet remarkably often the perpetrators have developed sufficient reputation to get away with it for a long time before the smelly stuff hits the air distribution system. I’m reminded
of the heavyweight financial gurus and dodgy accountants that turn out to have been swindling their customers for ages (and then often get let out of jail on grounds of age and ill-health). And I’m horrified that my daily SEO group updates from LinkedIn seem to be increasingly populated by Multi-Level-Marketing related posts. The last thing the SEO industry needs is to be associated with such blatant pyramid schemes or the stuff that Aaron’s talking about.

I still haven’t thought of a snazzy hook but maybe that’s the point of this post – there aren’t any shortcuts for good businesses. Good long-term marketing has to be built on solid ethical approaches.

So if you’re looking for someone to get you search rankings for some get rich quick scheme by dodgy black hat tricks or worthless comment spam then move on, you’re in the wrong place – don’t call me. I’ve spent a lifetime developing principles and I don’t plan to break them now. On the other hand if you have an honest business and you want advice on how to maximise it through ethical internet marketing and SEO then that’s the way I like to operate (when I don’t have flu).